There is widening gap between the American people and their armed forces, and this is not a good thing, according to Karl W. Eikenberry, a retired Army lieutenant general, and David M. Kennedy is an emeritus professor of history at Stanford. Writing in The New York Times, they note:

Less than 0.5 percent of the population serves in the armed forces, compared with more than 12 percent during World War II. Even fewer of the privileged and powerful shoulder arms. In 1975, 70 percent of members of Congress had some military service; today, just 20 percent do, and only a handful of their children are in uniform.

This is just one of the developments that, according to the authors, "present a disturbingly novel spectacle: a maximally powerful force operating with a minimum of citizen engagement and comprehension." You can read more here.

Congratulations Father Rutherford

Father Donald Rutherford, a priest of the Diocese of Albany, New York, is the new chief of chaplains of the U.S. Army. He holds the rank of major general and will be officially sworn in July 22.

Military matters

Author and syndicated columnist Richard Reeves recently wrote a Memorial Day column about the American military, which raises some interesting issues:

The volunteer military is the new American segregation. They know it and we know it. We also know that sooner or later a detached military will undermine democracy itself. Interestingly, Adm. Mike Mullen, the retiring chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has spent a good deal of his time and energy trying to get this point across to the nation.

Adm. Mullen's latest effort was his commencement speech last week at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. "I fear that they do not know us," said the admiral. "I fear they do not comprehend the full weight of the burden we carry or the price we pay when we return from battle. ... A people uninformed about what we are asking the military to endure is a people inevitably unable to fully grasp the scope of the responsibilities our Constitution levies upon them."

"It is not enough today that we deploy," he said. "It is not enough that we fight. It is not enough today that we serve, unless we also serve the greater cause of American self-government and everything that underpins it."

A month earlier, Mullen had said in a commencement speech at Florida State University:

"With less than 1 percent of our population serving, I do worry that one day, the American people and our troops may no longer know each other the way we should. When I consider how much that 1 percent has repeatedly sacrificed, especially our wounded, their families and the families of the fallen, I think it's worth asking ourselves as Americans whether we're doing enough to help them and, more broadly, our nation and our community."

"Warfare has become something for other people to do," added Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who is also leaving his post this year. "With each passing decade fewer and fewer Americans know someone with military experience in their family or social circle."

The all-volunteer military is, to me, Richard Nixon's last dirty trick. He pushed for it in 1969 because he understood the root cause of demonstrations against the war in Vietnam was the anguish and anxiety of young people concerned about being drafted — and killed. End the draft and you end the demonstrations — and that is what happened. As Gates said, we became a nation with a paid army, young men and women drawn from the poorer parts of the country, volunteering in the hope of breaking out of ghettos of despair, poverty, ignorance and boredom.

They fight well, very well, our volunteers. Our role, in addition to paying them, is to watch. War has become like the National Football League. Yeah, a few guys get hurt, but it's all pretty exciting entertainment — and it's free for most of us. So we send the same people, our volunteers, again and again into unending wars because, though we watch the action, we actually have no personal interest in what the game is about.

I personally believe we should reinstate Selective Service or universal national service, but I know that's not going to happen. The volunteer military is just too easy, Congress doesn't have to do anything unpopular and the rest of us can get by saying, "Thank you for your service, whoever you are."

The rest of this column is here.